Regretfully it has been a long time since our last Newsletter although most of you who attend our monthly meetings have been kept up to date with what has been going on, we know that there are a number of members who for one reason or another, cannot attend.
This is why this Newsletter is so important and we have been trying to continue with it but time is no man’s friend.
We are still in the ridiculous situation where the Slow Release Methylphenidate, either in the form of Ritalin or Concerta has not been imported into Malta. Lots of excuses from everyone do nothing to help us. We have appealed to the Minister, Director General of Health and the Drug Therapeutic Committee themselves but to no avail. Please don’t think we have stopped trying.
The situation vis a vis the administration of medication in schools has also been shelved despite appeals to the Ministry of Education. The Ministerial Committee for Inclusive Education has also proved impotent in the face of this dilemma and put the ball in the court of the Attorney General. We know the law needs to be changed before teachers will be allowed to administer medication, the question is when is this going to happen? Like the old rhyme from our childhood days “this year, next year, some time, never”. Again I appeal to all those parents who are having problems with the administration of medication to their child during school hours to contact me. Unless we show a united front, we will get nowhere!
Whereas St. Luke’s Hospital is proving competent at diagnosing AD/HD, the after sales service remains nil. When are we going to see a counselling service set up for parents and siblings? When are parent training sessions going to be started?
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
parenting. It is also important to study
ADHD SYMPTOMS IN PARENTS
whether ADHD symptoms in parents affects the benefit they derive from parent training
PARENTING
programs designed to teach parenting skills
BEHAVIOUR
and strategies that are helpful for a child who has ADHD. This knowledge could
Although researchers and clinicians have
potentially contribute to the development of
noted difficulty that adults with ADHD are
likely to experience in their interpersonal
relationships, little attention has been paid to how the disorder might affect their behaviour
Despite the importance of this issue, there
has been only one prior study in which ADHD symptoms in parents were related to
the effectiveness of parent training. In this
ADHD symptoms may place a parent at risk
for engaging in parenting practices that
improvement following parent training, while
behavior difficulties in their child. For
children who benefited strongly from the
intervention. Participants in this study were
limited to parents of preschool children,
emotions when disciplining their child.
Impulsivity may also contribute to a parent being overly permissive by increasing
A recent issue of the Journal of Attention
likelihood that the parent will "give in" to a
child's coercive behavior because this can
http://parentsubscribers.c.tep1.com/maabP3
Vaa3s18b3aZCHb/ - includes an interesting
reducing/eliminating a child's whining), even
though this typically creates more problems
behavior (Harvey, E.J., et al [2003]. Parenting of children with ADHD: The role of
parental ADHD Symptomatology. Journal of
also create difficulties in parenting. For
Attention Disorders, 7, 31-43). In this study,
example, parents who are highly inattentive
the authors examined the relation between
parents' self-reported ADHD symptoms and
their parenting behavior both before and
after participating in a behavioral parent-
attending to what the child is doing and
training program. The authors predicted that
for different behaviors. This may be more
symptoms would demonstrate less effective
difficult for parents who are highly inattentive
parenting strategies before parent training
and would show less improvement in their parenting
It has been found in prior research that as many as 25-30% of parents who have a
PARTICIPANTS
child with ADHD have ADHD themselves. In many cases, ADHD in parents has never
Participants in the study were 46 mothers
and 26 fathers who were recruited through
become aware that they have ADHD until it
becomes apparent when having their child
schools. All were parents of a child (age
range 4-12) with ADHD, the vast majority of whom were boys. The age of mothers and
fathers in the study ranged from the mid-20s
children with ADHD, and may contribute to
difficulties in parenting, it is important to
learn how ADHD in parents may impact their
or nagged; and 4) compliance - used when
STUDY PROCEDURE
the child complied with a request made by the parent.
Prior to participating in the parent training intervention, parents completed a number of
The parent-training program consisted of 8-
measures intended to assess their level of
weekly sessions that lasted for 75 minutes.
instruction on giving effective commands,
assessed via their self-report on the Adult
and how to use praise, reprimands, and time
Attention Deficit Disorder Evaluation Scale.
typical for the general adult population.
effective and ineffective parenting practices
Parenting behavior was assessed in several
parents completed the parenting measures
Parenting Scale in which they rated their
for a second time, including audiotaping
tendency to employ a variety of specific
interactions with their child. This enabled
changes in parenting behavior had occurred.
summary score for each parent that indicated their tendency to be overly
reactive/punitive in their disciplinary style and overly lax/permissive. Parents also
Is there a relationship between parents'
assess their general level of nurturance and
For mothers, higher levels of inattentive
Finally, parents were asked to audiotape
symptoms were associated with a more lax
their interactions with their child for 3 hours
parenting style (i.e. being more permissive)
both before and after parent training. This is
discipline (e.g. getting ready for school in the
parenting tends to be associated with higher
morning, getting chores completed, etc).
levels of child behavior problems. After
parent training, higher levels of impulsivity
evaluated to determine the frequency of the
following parent behaviors: 1) using negative
command/directive in an effort to get the
child to comply; 3) arguing with the child to get the child to do something or to stop
doing something; and, 4) praising the child
reported ADHD symptoms and self-reported
or verbalizing some other form of affection.
parenting style were stronger. Fathers who reported
interactions were coded as: 1) noncompliant
- used when child did not comply with their
emotionally reactive with their child. These
parent's request; 2) ignore - used when the
relationships were found both before and
child did not respond to parent or produced
after parent training. The combination of
high reactivity and high permissiveness may
be especially problematic, as it suggests a
when the child talked back, argued, swore,
parenting style in which one frequently loses
one's temper but fails to follow through on
however, these changes were substantially
enforcing consequences. As with mothers,
greater among mothers without high levels
there was no indication that fathers' ADHD
of inattentive symptoms. Among children,
symptoms were related to their general level
ignoring parental commands were reduced.
Is there a relationship between parents'
ADHD symptoms and their interactions with
negative tone and arguing were found.
Significant changes in child behavior, however, were not evident.
Before parent training, maternal reports of impulsive and inattentive symptoms were
IMPLICATIONS
not associated with their own or their child's behavior. After parent training, however,
Results from this study are consistent with
mothers who were more impulsive and more
commands and higher levels of arguing.
Their children were more noncompliant, engaged in more verbal misbehavior, and
were more likely to ignore their mothers'
permissive and reactive with their child before and after parent training. Fathers'
These results appeared to reflect the fact
impulsivity was also associated with more
that highly inattentive mothers were helped
least by the parent training - i.e., parent
training produced little if any change in their parenting behavior. Mothers who reported
For mothers, inattention was associated with
lower levels of ADHD symptoms, in contrast,
showed significant change in their parenting
training, and with more problematic child
behavior after parent training. In addition, mothers with clinically elevated levels of
For fathers, higher levels of impulsivity and
inattentive symptoms benefited less from the
inattentiveness were associated with more
parent-training program. This is consistent
arguing with their child prior to parent
with a prior finding that mothers with high
training. After parent training, none of the
levels of ADHD symptoms showed the least
symptoms, fathers' behavior, or child behavior were significant. There was also no
indication that fathers with high levels of
important implications. First, they highlight
symptoms in parents when their child is being evaluated for ADHD. ADHD is known
Was the parent training program effective?
to be more common in parents who have a child with ADHD and may not have
Although the central focus of the study was
to examine the association between parents'
indicates that in such situations, parents'
behavior, it is also interesting to examine the
effectiveness of their parenting and the
impact of the parent training program on
benefit they derive from working on their
parenting skills. Treating ADHD symptoms in parents may thus be an important
component of effectively managing ADHD in
indicated that mothers reduced their use of a
children, not to mention the benefits such
negative tone with their child, reduced their
treatment may have for parents independent
Second, for mothers in particular, high levels
The authors have done the field a service by
initiating work in this important area.
benefits they derive from participating in
Hopefully, additional research on this topic
programs can be modified to provide greater
Dr. David Rabiner, PhD, Duke University, USA
This study has several limitations that the
YOUR CHILD HAS SCHOOL PROBLEMS:
First, the sample size, particularly of fathers,
TO BLAME?
was relatively small. Replicating the study
by Pamela Darr Wright, M.A.,
with a larger sample would thus be important.
M.S.W. Licensed Clinical Social Worker
Second, it is problematic that parental ADHD symptoms were assessed only via self-report, rather than by conducting more
I know they think Brian’s problems are my fault. When I said that I thought he needed more individual help from the LD teacher, they shook their heads. They only "do
Third, this study does not enable one to
collaborative" now. They told me I shouldn’t use the word "dyslexia" because it sounds so hopeless. Then they asked how my husband and I wre getting along! (Denise,
behavior that characterized parents with
mother of a boy diagnosed with emotional
related to other factors beside their ADHD
The school psychologist said that all these
Despite these limitations, results from this
school problems were Shannon’s fault. He said that she was lazy and unmotivated and that we needed to pressure her to work harder. We didn’t allow her to watch television. We didn't allow her to go out with Homework took hours to complete, even
2) The value of assessing parents for ADHD
when we helped her. We didn’t know what
when evaluating their child, or, when parents
else to do. We didn’t want to raise a lazy child. (Emory and Elaine Carter, Shannon’s
parenting suggestions that are offered as
daughter had dyslexia and ADHD. See Florence County School District Four v. Shannon Carter, 510 U.S. 7, (1993).
treatment of providing effective treatment for ADHD to parents
Parents of special ed kids often say that
4) The need to consider how parent training
they are intimidated, patronized and made to
programs can be modified so that they may
feel guilty and inadequate by staff at their
be more effective for parents who may have
helpless, frustrated, and defensive. Not surprisingly, parents behave exactly like
Dr. Alessi’s study illustrates why so many
parents have problems dealing with schools.
uncomfortable, most parents try to explain
Dr. Alessi’s article is "Diagnosis Diagnosed:
and justify their position, in hopes that they
will be understood. A few go on the offence,
Professional School Psychology, 3(2), 145-
firing volleys of blame back. Many parents
find these experiences exquisitely painful
(Since this study is based on practices in the
and humiliating. If they withdraw and try to
USA I have not included it but if anyone is
avoid school functions, they find that they've
particularly interested in reading it, please contact
been labelled as "uninvolved parents."
me. The problems described here, however,
Again, they are blamed for their children’s
Sometimes, emotions get out of control. Feelings of anger, bitterness, and betrayal
HELPING CHILDREN WITH ADHD
consume parents and school personnel -who are then unable to work together to
FRIENDSHIPS
make educational decisions. In these cases, everyone loses. The child is usually the
A consistent finding in studies designed to
biggest loser if the parents and educators
developmental outcomes is that peer relationship difficulties predict a number of
experiences? Are parents too sensitive? Do
(particularly those who act aggressively
towards peers) fare significantly worse in
happens in their contacts with educators? Or
are parents just over-protective of their
relations. One reason this may occur is that rejected children often gravitate towards one
If you are a "special ed" parent, you know
that it's hard to fight - and almost impossible
reinforce/escalate each other's antisocial
to bail out. If your child receives special
behavior. Rejection by peers can also have
a negative affect on children's self-esteem
school meetings and you have to cooperate
in developing your child’s IEPs. How can
And here's another question: If the school
staff believes that you or your child are
responsible for your child’s problems, how
behavior and difficulties reading social cues
can you work with them so your child’s
that may result from attention deficits, many
children with ADHD have problems getting
ensure that your child gets a good quality
along with peers. In fact, prior research has
shown that many children with ADHD begin to be rejected by unfamiliar children after
If you have run into a "brick wall" of
only a single day of contact. And, once a
resistance when you tried to obtain changes
in your child’s educational program, you
established, it can be difficult to change
need to understand how schools really
even if a child's social behavior improves. work. You need to understand "school culture" and the beliefs held by many
Because developing positive peer relations
can be so difficult for children with ADHD,
administrators, and guidance counselors.
there have been several studies in which efforts to peer relations in children with
Dr. Galen Alessi, Professor of Psychology at
Western Michigan University, conducted a
fascinating study on school psychologists.
psychostimulant medication and behavioral
http://parentsubscribers.c.tclk.net/maabmaA
interventions do not generally normalize the
social standing for children with ADHD. In
interesting preliminary examination of efforts
addition, efforts to directly teach social skills
to children with ADHD have so far yielded
friendships (Hoza, B. et al., A friendship
results that are less positive than one would
Preliminary findings. Journal of Attention Disorders, 6, 87-97).
One limitation of research on improving peer relationships for children with ADHD is that
Participants were 209 5-12 year old children
improving children's overall standing in the
peer group, rather than trying to help them
develop a single close friendship. Although
presence vs. absence of even a single close
A variety of child-focused interventions are
Whether or not a child has a close friendship
implemented during the program including a
can be relatively independent of the child's
social standing within the wider peer group,
training, social problem solving training, and
sports skills training. Children also spend
current and future adjustment. For example,
part of each day in a structured classroom
research has shown that even if a child is
lessons are taught. All interventions are
friend is associated with less loneliness,
that includes ample time for recreational
higher feelings of general self-worth. Thus,
it appears that having a close friend can
typically do not know each other before the
help compensate for the negative effects of
being rejected by the larger peer group.
In addition to the interventions mentioned
above, a program called "the buddy system"
that social interventions for children with
ADHD should include efforts to help them
development of dyadic friendship skills. This
involved pairing each child with an age and
possible, children were paired according to
argued that helping a child establish a good
weeks into the program. Buddies were also
friendship should be easier than trying to
paired based on similarities in behavioral,
overcome a child's negative reputation in the
athletic, and academic competencies and on
larger peer group. And, the known benefits
of having a close friend suggest that this
together that play dates could occur outside
children with ADHD. Of course, not all children with ADHD are disliked by peers or
Parents were encouraged to talk with the
lack friends, but for those who do, helping
parents of their child's buddy's t arrange play
them make and keep a friend could be very
dates outside of the STP. Children and their
buddies were also given special privileges within the STP in order to optimize the
Although this is a compelling and logical
idea, there has not been prior research on
another and form a friendship. In addition, a
this topic. A study published in the April
coach for each buddy pair. Each morning,
the coach checked in with members of the
pair to learn how the child and his/her buddy were getting along, and to suggest ways to
handle any problems that were reported. At
impact of the buddy's antisocial behavior on
the end of each week, the coach met with
both children together to help them work out
more antisocial behavior a child's buddy
any difficulties in their friendship that
displayed, the less likely teachers were to
see academic or behavioral improvement in
efforts, it was hoped that each child would
the child. Conversely, when a child's buddy
maintaining a good friendship during the
likely to be regarded by teachers as making
As part of the STP, extensive information was collected on all children. This included
IMPLICATIONS
behavior ratings by counselors, teachers, and parents, and teacher ratings of
This study represents an initial effort to
evaluate an intervention designed to help
activities. Ratings were obtained at the
children with ADHD establish and maintain a
beginning and end of the program so that
friendship. The results of this preliminary
change could be evaluated on a variety of
work are both instructive and encouraging,
and have potentially important implications for helping children with ADHD.
Counselors, teachers, and children also rated the quality of each child's relationship
First, it is noteworthy that the antisocial
behavior of a child's buddy influenced how
teachers perceived the child. Specifically,
influenced the quality of children's buddy
when a child's buddy was highly antisocial,
relationship, as well as factors the predicted
teachers rated the child as less successful
Although teachers' may have rated children with an antisocial buddy in a more negative
manner than was truly warranted, children with an antisocial buddy may also have
been negatively influenced by their buddy's
behavior. It is well established that children
relationship with their buddy. Children who
who associate with disruptive and antisocial
engaged in more antisocial behavior during
the program were seen by their teachers as
themselves, and the finding in this study is
achieving a relationship of lower quality with
consistent with this. This highlights how
their buddy. Children whose parents were
important it is for parents to monitor who
more supportive of the buddy intervention -
their child is spending time with, and to work
i.e. those who parents arranged frequent
hard to keep their child from associating with
antisocial peers. This can be critically
show better relationship quality according to
important in preventing a child from traveling
down an antisocial path him or herself.
the buddy program, children tended to be seen as more positive and adaptive by
Second, it was encouraging to learn that
counselors at the end of the program.
when parents worked hard to support the buddy program by arranging play dates for
Importantly, parents' support of the buddy
program also predicted children's perception
of the quality of their buddy relationship:
Furthermore, there was some indication that
when parents were more supportive children
were more satisfied with the friendship they
associated with more positive behavior in
Although other medications are sometimes
These findings highlight the important role
parents can play in helping children with
antidepressants, clonidine, buproprion), until
recently, the FDA had not yet approved any
Because many children with ADHD struggle
non-stimulant medication as a treatment for
negative effects of being rejected by the
larger peer group, parents who help their
approval as an ADHD treatment for children,
adolescents, and adults. In fact, although
shown to be effective for adults with ADHD, Strattera is the only FDA approved
Although research to guide parents' efforts
medication clinically proven effective for
to assist their child develop a friendship is
needed, it appears that this is an area where parents can make an important difference in
Unlike stimulants, which are believed to
their child's life. Teachers and professionals
can help support parents' efforts in this
impact on the availability of dopamine in the
regard, perhaps by acting as a "buddy
central nervous system, Strattera exerts its
coach" as counselors did in this study.
effect on the neurotransmitter known as norephinphrine. Like some of the longer
Helping children with ADHD build close peer
acting stimulants (e.g. Concerta, Adderall
relationships is an important goal to focus
XR), Strattera offers the convenience of
on, and is one that may often be overlooked
classified as a controlled substance, more
convenient phone-in prescription refills will
Results from this study indicate that parents
have an important role to play in achieving helping their child accomplish this important
social goal, and one hope that additional
research in this area with be forthcoming.
introduction of an effective new medication
for treating ADHD represents an important
addition to the range of available treatment options. Because Strattera works through an
A Comparison of Atomoxetine
mechanism, individuals for whom stimulant medications were not effective, may derive
(Strattera) and Methylphenidate
significant benefits from this new treatment. treatment in children with ADHD
And, individuals who experienced intolerable side effects from stimulants may not
shown to be a helpful treatment for many
Strattera. Finally, some parents who had
children and adolescents with ADHD, there
remains considerable interest in developing
medication for their child may be amenable
other medicinal options. This is because not
all children with ADHD respond positively to
because it is not classified as a controlled
reactions that preclude their use. In addition, although stimulants are generally
An important question regarding the use of
believed to be extremely safe medications,
this new medication, however, is whether it
they are classified as controlled substances
will generally be as effective as the currently
and many parents have concerns about the
available stimulant medications. In two prior
generic form of Ritalin) no differences in
Prior to beginning medication treatment,
patients received methylphenidate in these
Scale on each child to assess the severity of
studies to draw any firm conclusions. Thus,
additional investigation of how this new
the Conners Parent Rating Scale, a widely
medication compares to the stimulants is
needed. This was the issue addressed in a
study published recently in the Journal of the
during weekly follow up visits over a 10-
American Academy of Child and Adolescent
week period. Because not all participants
Atomoxetine and methylphenidate treatment
weeks (see below), the final set of rating
randomized, open-label trial. JAACAP, 41,
treatment outcome measure for each child.
Comparing these ratings with those obtained prior to treatment was then used to
determine each child's treatment response.
between the ages of 7 and 15 (all girls were younger than 9) who had been diagnosed with ADHD using a structured psychiatric
interview and standardized behavior-rating scales. Approximately 75% of participants
Ten of the 184 children given atomoxetine
were diagnosed with the combined subtype
had their medication discontinued prior to
of ADHD (i.e. they displayed both inattentive
the conclusion of the 10-week trial because
almost all others were diagnosed with the
inattentive subtype. (Note: For a complete
parent and/or the physician did not believe
Approximately half of all participants had a
comparable to what is generally reported for
stimulant medications. In the current study,
because of adverse events or lack of effect
For children in both groups, investigators'
ratings of ADHD symptom severity declined
atomoxetine or methylphenidate. (Note: In
substantially from the pre-treatment rating to
an open-label trial participants and those
the final rating obtained. These declines
were clinically meaningful in addition to
medication is being received). Because this
being statistically significant, and were
study was primarily intended to establish the
evident for both hyperactive-impulsive and
efficacy of atomoxetine, approximately 4
inattentive symptoms. The magnitude of the
atomoxetine than methylphenidate (i.e. 184
equivalent for children treated with the 2
medication were started on a low dose and
declines were obtained even though children
titrated upwards based on the investigator's
who had stopped treatment early because of
assessment of clinical response. Unlike the
poor response were included in the group
methyphenidate received 3 doses per day regimen, children receiving methylphenidate
Parent ratings followed a similar course.
in this study were dosed 1 to 3 times per day
Prior to treatment, average ADHD symptom
based on the investigator's assessment of
ratings for children in each group were in the
top 1% based on age and gender norms. This indicates exceptionally high levels of
difficulty. Following treatment, average
methylphenidate on children's behavior at
scores in both groups dropped significantly
and approached - but did not quite reach -normal levels. Once again, these declines
hyperactive-impulsive symptoms, and were
roughly comparable in each group. Similar
reductions in parents' report of children's
relationships, etc. - is also unknown. It
would not be prudent to assume that comparability on core ADHD symptoms
necessarily translates into equivalent impact
tolerated by participants and there was little
on associated difficulties, and this issue
difference in adverse reactions reported.
awaits further research. This is important,
drowsiness/sleepiness - were more common
medication treatment on long-term academic
among children taking atomoxetine. Small
reductions in weight occurred both groups.
The authors note that although this is unlikely to be of importance during short-
Finally, short acting methylphenidate may
term treatment, medication effects on weight
more substantial, and that data on weight
change associated with ongoing treatment
are currently under study. Information on
this issue has not yet been published for any
does not necessarily mean that it will be as
effective as these more recently introduced stimulants. It may be more effective, it may
Summary and Implications
be less effective, or it may be equally effective.
atomoxetine (i.e. this medication will be
marketed under the brand name Strattera)
It is important to note that even if these
symptoms in children. Each medication was
well tolerated by most children, although 2
and a particular medication is found - on
average - to be superior to others, no single
medication will be the best choice for all
children. Thus, a terrific benefit of having Strattera become available is that many
children who were not helped by stimulants
atomoxetine and stimulant medications may
Strattera. On the other hand, it cannot be
prevent a firm conclusion on this issue.
assumed that a child who is doing well on a
stimulant will do as will if switched to Strattera. This may or may not be the case.
Thus, for a child who has been receiving
acknowledge, this was not a double-blind,
stimulants and doing well, it is likely that
placebo-controlled study, which makes it
physicians will be appropriately cautious
impossible to completely rule out parent or
investigator expectations as influencing the results.
What about children beginning an initial trial of medication for ADHD treatment? Will
physicians continue to regard stimulants as
the initial treatment of choice or will Straterra
Pediatrics recommend that 2-3 stimulants be
tried across a full range of doses before switching to another class of medications.
Drug Administration (FDA) today approved
Strattera ™ (atomoxetine HCl), judging it
The stimulants have also been around for
much longer, obviously, and several studies
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents and adults.
- including the MTA study - have documented their efficacy in symptom
Studies on the longer-term effectiveness of
treatment for ADHD that is not a stimulant
Strattera are ongoing, however, and should
be available shortly. These will be very
interesting and important results to know
Strattera, reduces prescription hassles for
about, and will likely have a significant
patients, families and physicians by offering
impact on physicians' decisions about which
samples. Strattera is also believed to be a less likely candidate for abuse by patients
medication for their child, and for physicians
than other attention deficit drugs because it
is the only FDA-approved treatment for the disorder that is not a stimulant.
another clinically proven option that works by a different mechanism and which is not a
"Strattera is an important development in the
controlled substance represents a valuable
addition to existing treatments. Research
about its future," said Sidney Taurel, Lilly's
that documents the long-term benefits of
Strattera in managing ADHD symptoms, and
officer. "It gives patients, families and
in helping with associated difficulties, will
physicians an effective new tool for treating
hopefully be published shortly. As with any
medication, however, efforts to enhance functioning across a range of areas will
continue to require additional behavioral and
after the FDA issued an approvable letter for
academic supports for many children. And,
Strattera. Lilly expects to have Strattera
careful, systematic monitoring the ongoing
effectiveness of treatment will remain essential.
Clinical Studies
Lilly demonstrated Strattera's effectiveness
in treating ADHD with data from six placebo-
controlled clinical studies, involving children,
adolescents and adults. So far, more than
Dr. David Rabiner, PhD, Duke University, USA
4,000 patients have taken Strattera in all
completed and ongoing clinical trials, some for as long as two-and-a-half years. Strattera comes in a capsule and can be taken once or twice a day. Strattera is the first ADHD
FDA Approves Strattera™,
medication proven clinically effective in
First Noncontrolled Option For Treatment of Attention-
"Strattera is unique, because of its different
Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
mechanism of action for ADHD; it's the first noncontrolled medication indicated for the treatment of ADHD. It provides full-day relief
impulsivity that are inappropriate for the
insomnia in most children and adolescents,"
suggests a biological cause and a genetic
professor of psychiatry, Harvard Medical
link for the disorder, and experts estimate up
to 60 percent of children with the disorder
continue to have symptoms as adults.
Spencer is one of the initial investigators to
"Left untreated, ADHD can have significant
conduct clinical trials with Strattera.
negative consequences, and not just at school or work. It also affects social and
How Strattera Works
family situations, as well as self-worth," Dr. Spencer said.
reuptake inhibitor, works differently than any
other FDA-approved ADHD treatments. It's
recognized, experts estimate 4 percent of
not known precisely how Strattera reduces
adults, more than 8 million people, have the
ADHD symptoms. Scientists believe it works
norepinephrine, a brain chemical considered
important in regulating attention, impulsivity
disorder, and in part because of concerns
about giving controlled substances to adults.
norepinephrine at work in the tiny spaces between neurons in the brain.
"Adults with ADHD tend to have lower rates of professional employment, more frequent
Strattera should not be taken at the same
job changes and lower self-esteem. These
time as, or within two weeks of taking, a
monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI), or by
professional, highlight the need for effective
treatment of the disorder," said Lenard
Patients with a history of high or low blood
Adler, M.D. Dr. Adler is a psychiatrist and
pressure, increased heart rate, or any heart
director of the Department of Neurology,
or blood vessel disease should tell their
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
doctor before taking Strattera. Strattera has
Program, and associate professor of clinical
not been tested in children less than 6 years
psychiatry and neurology at the New York
when starting treatment with Strattera. As with all ADHD medications, growth should
DO BOYS WITH AD/HD OVERESTIMATE COMPETENCE?
experienced side effects were not bothered enough to stop using Strattera. The most
about themselves, there have actually been
relatively few studies in which the self-
stomach. In adults, the most common side
concepts of children with and without ADHD
effects were problems sleeping, dry mouth,
decreased appetite, upset stomach, nausea
or vomiting, dizziness, problems urinating,
children with ADHD regard themselves less favorably in a number of different domains
than other children, while other researchers have not found these differences.
ADHD affects 3-7 percent of school age children, making it the most-commonly
A related area of research has examined the
diagnosed behavioral disorder of childhood.
appraisals that children make of their own
It manifests itself in levels of attention,
concentration, activity, distractibility and
participation in a laboratory task. Thus, in
comparison subjects. Unfortunately, as has
these studies, researchers have examined
often been the case in research on ADHD,
how the self-appraisals of ADHD children
females were not included as participants.
vary in situations where their actual level of performance
Participants' self-perceptions were assessed
using the Self-Perception Profile for Children
involved academic or social activities, boys
with ADHD tend to report they did better
assesses children's views of themselves in
five specific areas: academic performance,
evaluate their performance more accurately.
Findings from these laboratory studies have
specific ratings, the SPPC also includes
led some researchers to speculate that boys
items designed to assess children's general
with ADHD (unfortunately, girls with ADHD
feelings of self-worth. The idea behind this
have not been included in this research)
have "positive illusory self-concepts". It has
specific self-perceptions that can vary from
been argued that holding unrealistically
one area to another, in addition to more
positive views about themselves may serve
general feelings about themselves that are
an important protective function for boys
with ADHD, by allowing them to cope with repeated
To assess the boys' actual competencies in
SPPC, their teachers completed a teacher
that this "self-protective" strategy may
responses to the same sets of items were
problems if it leads them to deny that they
assessment of how the boys were actually doing in each domain, and provided a
Although these are interesting speculations,
benchmark against which boys' self-ratings
it is important to recognize that there has
been no previous research in which the self-
ratings were higher than the ratings provided
by his teacher in a particular domain, it
examined in relation to their actual abilities
suggests that the child's self-perceptions in
and competencies. The laboratory studies
that domain were inflated. Similarly, if a
child's self-ratings were lower than those of
appraisals of their performance on specific
his teacher, it suggests that the child was
tasks, and findings from these studies may
being unrealistically negative. When child
not generalize to the more enduring views
and teacher ratings corresponded, it was
assumed to reflect the fact that the child had
an accurate perception of his competence.
have inflated self-concepts has not been
(Note: The teacher measure did not include
items reflecting children's feelings of general self-worth because these reflect a child's
Do boys with ADHD actually have "positively
views of self that are independent of specific
areas of competence, and thus can not be
suggested? This question was examined in
compared to an "objective standard".)
a study published recently in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology (Hoza, B. et al, 2002,
The researchers predicted that, although the
111, 268-278.) Participants in this study
differ from those of comparison boys in an
13. The majority of these boys (195) had
relative to the "objective" ratings provided by
teachers. In other words, they expected to
treatment program. The remaining 73 boys
find that ADHD boys had "positive illusory
self-concepts". Furthermore, they expected
the greatest inflation would be found in
those domains that were most problematic
for the boys. Thus, for boys with ADHD who
also had significant learning problems, their
specific areas. It was predicted that boys
expected to show the greatest inflation. For
competence to the greatest extent in the
expected in the behavioral and social domains. For ADHD boys who were
depressed, no domain-specific predictions
competence to the greatest extent in the
feelings about themselves on the general
teacher-ratings for these boys greater than for non-ADHD comparison boys, it was also
greater than the discrepancy for ADHD boys without aggressive-behavior problems. For
overestimate their competence relative to
found for ratings of academic competence.
boys without significant learning difficulties,
children in the two groups. Results indicated
themselves similarly to the way in which
their teachers had rated them in all domains.
The situation for ADHD boys who also were
teachers had rated them in the academic,
boys were the only group to underestimate
their physical appearance, rating themselves
as less attractive than their teachers rated
significantly higher than that for comparison
boys in every domain. In other words, their
behavioral domain, but to a lesser extent
domains, their self-ratings were not inflated. On the global self-worth scale, they had
significantly lower scores than boys without
groups did not differ in an absolute sense.
Thus, the ratings made by boys with ADHD were
SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS
comparison boys, indicating that ADHD boys did not regard themselves as either more or
The major findings of this study were: ADHD
boys overestimated their self-perceptions
noted above, however, comparisons to the
more than comparison boys in scholastic,
teacher ratings indicated that, for boys with
social, and behavioral domains relative to
ADHD, these views of themselves are overly
positive and do not reflect the opinions of
examination of ratings provided by boys in
their teachers that are presumed to be more
the different subgroups indicated that they
overestimated their competence the most in those domains in which they were most
impaired. Thus, even though they did not
comparison boys in an absolute sense, boys
not be assumed that these findings apply to
with ADHD perceived themselves to be far
all boys with ADHD. Thus, many boys with
more competent than their teachers did. The
depressed -- will regard themselves quite
negatively, rather than overestimating their
several areas, including their feelings of
may be especially true as boys with ADHD
move into adolescence, and replicating this study with a teenage population would be an
important extension of this research.
argued that these inflated self-perceptions serve a self-protective role for boys with
We also do not know what the implications
of these findings are for the immediate or
longer-term adjustment of boys with ADHD.
with daily struggles and difficulties. This
competence create more trouble for these
boys because it eliminates the motivation to
work on their difficulties? Or, does it protect
themselves" in an effort to avoid feelings of
despondent? Questions like this can only
suggest these findings may represent either
be answered by following boys over time,
and examining their ongoing adjustment in
themselves favorably to others), or the fact
provided by others that were the focus of
this study. This is difficult work, but the
results of such a longitudinal study would be extremely interesting and informative.
What are the implications of these results for
treatment? There is a lack of clarity on this
Dr. David Rabiner, PhD, Duke University, USA
suggested that if ADHD boys overestimate their
families with children with intellectual
situation. Proponents of this view argue
families whose children have disabilities –
accurate appraisal of their abilities and how
resources problem, we should solve the one
expressed concerns that such "humility training" could be damaging to boys' self-
Having got all that off my chest, I hope you
esteem. Clearly, there is no simple answer
enjoy reading the articles in this Newsletter.
We have included a number of articles about
medication since we are getting a number of
person is an individual and you should always follow the advice of your doctor who
As with any study, it is important to be
knows you best. If you would like to see
careful not to generalize the results of this
information about anything in particular,
research beyond what is reasonable. First,
please contact us on our e-mail address.
the findings obtained apply only to boys with ADHD, and whether ADHD girls show the
competence is not known. Second, it should
Publications: GMC/GH, Sec.bad Name of the Article Journal Published in Department Corresponding Author Printed during 2012-13 Dr. Nirmala Cherukuri Necrotizing fasciitis in an infant secondary Sciences, Vol.2, No.1, Jan-March 2013 , to varicella zoster infection GMC, Secunderabad. By Dr. Usha Rani Thota , Rusty pipe syndrome : A Case Report Vitamin D
by other methods previously. The diagnosis was based Imiquimod Treatment of Lentigo Maligna: on clinical examination including dermoscopy and his- An Open-Label Study of 34 Primary Lesions tologic evaluation of a 3-mm punch biopsy specimen. In- in 32 Patients formed consent was obtained from all patients. Topical imiquimod, 5%, cream was applied to the pig- L entigomaligna(LM)isaninsit