Kamagra enthält Sildenafilcitrat als pharmakologisch aktiven Bestandteil. Dieser hemmt selektiv die Phosphodiesterase-5 und erhöht dadurch die Konzentration von cGMP im Corpus cavernosum. Der Effekt ist zeitlich begrenzt, da die Halbwertszeit von Sildenafil etwa vier Stunden beträgt. In der galenischen Form als Mundgel erfolgt die Resorption besonders rasch, was zu einem schnelleren Wirkeintritt führt. Der Abbau erfolgt überwiegend hepatisch über CYP3A4, wobei ein aktiver Metabolit entsteht, der zur Gesamtwirkung beiträgt. Typische Nebenwirkungen ergeben sich aus der Vasodilatation, darunter leichte Kopfschmerzen und nasale Kongestion. In klinischen Beschreibungen wird kamagra oral jelly im Zusammenhang mit der schnelleren Absorption erwähnt.

Issue #

Issue: 2007-49, Test Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by /AFAPTemplate.txt on: Monday, September, 24, 2007 at 16:16:41 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: AFAP Issue Submission Issue: <a href= >overnigth Wellbutrin SR</a><a href= >Zyban supplements</a><a href= >cheap Wellbutrin >overnigth Zyban</a><a href= >Paxil no prescription</a><a href= >Zyban medication</a><a href= >cheapest Wellbutrin SR</a><a href= >overnigth Prozac</a><a href= >ups Celexa</a><a href= >Prednisone online</a> Possible Solution: <a href= >overnigth Wellbutrin SR</a><a href= >Zyban supplements</a><a >cheap Wellbutrin SR</a><a href= >overnigth Zyban</a><a href= >Paxil no prescription</a><a href= >Zyban medication</a><a href= >cheapest Wellbutrin SR</a><a href= >overnigth Prozac</a><a href= >ups Celexa</a><a href= >Prednisone online</a> First Name: Sebastian Last Name: Sebastian Phone: None Email: pop476roach@kip.net --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Issue 49-07, 1. PURPOSE: 2. ISSUE RECOMMENDATION(S): 3. FACTS: 2007 FORT BRAGG AFAP CONFERENCE
Issue Number: 49-07
Issue Title: Test
Did the workgroup prioritize this issue as a critical
Issue’s New Title (If prioritized and written by your workgroup)
Were similar issues (same concern) submitted to this AFAP
Conference?
Identify issue number and title of similar issue:
Issue Number:
Issue Title:
Issue clarity
Was the issue clearly written?
Did Delegates understand this issue?
If not, what was the problem in fully understanding it?
DISPOSITION This issue was submitted as a test. Identify the primary reason(s) the work group did not prioritize this issue. Please be specific—these
comments are returned to the submitting Command.
Check here if issue was prioritized by the workgroup.

Source: http://www.fortbraggmwr.com/acs/afapissues/afap07_49.pdf