Kamagra enthält Sildenafilcitrat als pharmakologisch aktiven Bestandteil. Dieser hemmt selektiv die Phosphodiesterase-5 und erhöht dadurch die Konzentration von cGMP im Corpus cavernosum. Der Effekt ist zeitlich begrenzt, da die Halbwertszeit von Sildenafil etwa vier Stunden beträgt. In der galenischen Form als Mundgel erfolgt die Resorption besonders rasch, was zu einem schnelleren Wirkeintritt führt. Der Abbau erfolgt überwiegend hepatisch über CYP3A4, wobei ein aktiver Metabolit entsteht, der zur Gesamtwirkung beiträgt. Typische Nebenwirkungen ergeben sich aus der Vasodilatation, darunter leichte Kopfschmerzen und nasale Kongestion. In klinischen Beschreibungen wird kamagra oral jelly im Zusammenhang mit der schnelleren Absorption erwähnt.
Name instrument
Checklist gender perspective Use This checklist follows the structure of the list for quality criteria. It enables you not only to test the de-
gree of your gender sensitivity but you can also identify areas of your work where a gender approach
can be introduced. If you use this checklist periodically, if you really set out to exploit the potential for
improvement and implement corresponding measures, you will be able to develop, check and docu-ment your gender competence.
Test questions Basics of health promotion
1.1 Health equity: Does the planned intervention promote health equity between girls/women and
1.4 Participation of principal actors in the settings: Are male and female representatives of the target
Assessment
2.1 Demonstration of the need for the project (normative need): Do male and female representatives
of the target group differ in their approach to the project’s topic and has this issue been re-
2.2 Needs of stakeholders and target groups (felt/expressed needs): Are the gender needs of both
sexes adequately considered when planning the implementation?
2.5 Learning from past projects: Does your project have explicit quality objectives regarding gender?
Project planning
3.2 Justification for proposed procedures: When planning the procedure, has the potential need for
gender-specific interventions been considered?
Project organization
4.1 Adequate project structure: Are both women and men adequately represented in the project
organization (project team, advisory/steering groups)?
4.2 Qualifications and requirements: If necessary, will measures be taken to ensure the ‘female’ or
‘male’ perspective regarding the health topic in question?
Project management
5.2 Formative evaluation: Is data collection gender-specific regarding access to the project, success
or drop-out rates and sustainability of measures and are the results exploited for the steering of the project?
5.4 Motivation and satisfaction of personnel: Is the gender distribution within the project team and
the effect this could have on the project work a subject of periodic consideration and discussion?
www.quint-essenz.ch, a service of Health Promotion Switzerland Checklist gender perspective, Version 1.0, 01.06.2006
6.1 Summary evaluation of goal attainment: Does the evaluation of the project take into account
eventual differences of effects between girls/women and boys/men?
6.3 Project documentation: Are gender-specific differences documented in the project’s report?
6.4 Transfer and diffusion of results: Do you announce your gender competence, gender specific
Justification
Justification for not considering particular points: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Quality objectives and measures to be taken: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
www.quint-essenz.ch, a service of Health Promotion Switzerland Checklist gender perspektive, Version 1.0, 01.06.2006
Correlation between tea use and personalityJaap Bierman, Berber de Vries, Alwin ZwetsMedia Technology programme, Leiden University Abstract personalities of drinkers and non-drinkers, between tea and coffee users nor is there a correlation between tea use and the level of dubiousness. Agreeableness was measured using the Big Five Inventory and drinking of tea and coffee. This research cl