Gamca.az

This Provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance. Fully formatted PDF and full text (HTML) versions will be made available soon.
Acute cholecystitis - early laparoscopic surgery versus antibiotic therapy and
delayed elective cholecystectomy: ACDC-study
Trials 2007, 8:29
Article type
Submission date
Acceptance date
Publication date
Article URL
This peer-reviewed article was published immediately upon acceptance. It can be downloaded, printed and distributed freely for any purposes (see copyright notice below).
Articles in Trials are listed in PubMed and archived at PubMed Central.
For information about publishing your research in Trials or any BioMed Central journal, go to For information about other BioMed Central publications go to 2007 Weigand et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Acute cholecystitis – early laparoskopic surgery versus antibiotic therapy
and delayed elective cholecystectomy: ACDC-study
Kilian Weigand1, Jörg Köninger2, Jens Encke1, Markus W. Büchler2, Wolfgang Stremmel1,Carsten N. Gutt2,* 1 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Heidelberg, Germany 2 Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany Carsten Gutt, M.D.
Professor of SurgeryDepartment of General SurgeryUniversity of Heidelberg, Medical SchoolIm Neuenheimer Feld 110D-69120 HeidelbergGermanyemail: carsten.gutt@med.uni-heidelberg.de Abstract
Background: Acute cholecystitis occurs frequent in the elderly and in patients with gall
stones. Most cases of severe or recurrent cholecystitis eventually require surgery, usually laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Western World. It is unclear whether an initial, conservative approach with antibiotic and symptomatic therapy followed by delayed elective surgery results in better morbidity and outcome than immediate surgery. At present, treatment is generally determined by whether the patient first sees a surgeon or a gastroenterologist. We wish to investigate whether both approaches are equivalent. The primary endpoint is the morbidity until day 75 after inclusion into the study.
Design: A multicenter, prospective, randomized non-blinded study to compare treatment
outcome, complications and 75-day morbidity in patients with acute cholecystitis randomized to laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 hours of symptom onset or antibiotic treatment with moxifloxacin and subsequent elective cholecystectomy. For consistency in both arms moxifloxacin, a fluorquinolone with broad spectrum of activity and high bile concentration is used as antibiotic. Duration: October 2006 – November 2008 Organisation/Responsibility: The trial was planned and is being conducted and analysed by
the Departments of Gastroenterology and General Surgery at the University Hospital of Heidelberg according to the ethical, regulatory and scientific principles governing clinical research as set out in the Declaration of Helsinki (1989) and the Good Clinical Practice Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00447304
Background
Medical problem:
Acute cholecystitis is one of the most significant acute diseases in the Western World, and may be associated with only mild pain and nausea or become a severe, life-threatening illness due to complications. Acute cholecystitis is mainly caused by gall stones, whilst cholestasis is mainly associated with superinfection with bacteria, in general species of enterobacteria, enterococci, bacteroides and anaerobic streptococci [1].
The principal complication is recurrent biliary colic and cholestasis. The latter may lead to ascending cholangitis, and whilst this can be managed with antibiotics, other complications can not be cured conservatively, such as gangrenous changes, gall bladder perforation and biliary leakage, and acute necrotic gallstone pancreatitis [2-5]. Liver abscesses and underlying incidental carcinoma have also been reported in some cases [2, 6].
The risk of developing second and subsequent episodes of acute cholecystitis is higher than the risk of suffering an initial episode [7, 8]. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is therefore usually recommended, but whether this should be performed immediately or after first giving antibiotic treatment to allow the acute condition to subside is controversial [9-12].
Immediate surgery versus conservative procedure with subsequent elective surgery:
The approach taken is often decided by whether the patient first sees a gastroenterologist, who favors conservative initial antibiotic therapy with later elective surgery, or a surgeon, who It is still unclear which approach is better in medical and health economic terms. The infection may not respond to conservative treatment on one hand, on the other hand surgical intervention while the disease is acute may increase complications, and conversion to open surgery may be necessary. It is unclear whether it is better to conduct early cholecystectomy, thereby avoiding the risk of recurrent cholecystitis or pancreatitis.
A meta-analysis by Papi et al. (2003) including 12 prospective randomized trials showed no significant difference for morbidity and mortality between immediate surgical intervention (laparoscopic or open) and elective surgery after the acute inflammation had subsided [13].
The numbers of patients and rates of complications were too low to enable any conclusions to be drawn. Also, their definition of “immediate” was between 1 and 7 days after disease onset, while the modern standard favors laparoscopic surgery within 24 hours of onset [14, 15].
All studies in the meta-analysis had been performed between 1970 and 2000, and Papi concluded that new studies in an adequate number of patients to show statistical significance should be performed [13]. Two subsequent prospective randomized trials concerning the appropriate timing for surgery also failed to lead to conclusive results, except for a slightly shorter hospital stay in patients treated with immediate surgery [16, 17].
In many centers early cholecystectomy is well established although the evidence is not yet conclusive. To our knowledge there has never been a study in which both specialties - gastroenterology and surgery - are equally involved.
Choice of antibiotic:
Moxifloxacin (Avalox) covers the spectrum of gram-positive, gram-negative and anaerobic bacteria usually responsible for intra-abdominal infections [18-20]. It can be applied orally or intravenously in a single dose of 400 mg/day, resulting in bile concentrations significantly above the minimum inhibitory concentration [21], and 3–4 times higher than plasma A controlled double-blinded study in 379 patients in the USA showed moxifloxacin to be at least as effective as standard treatment by with piperacillin + tazobactam i.v. followed by oral amoxicillin + clavulanate in complicated intra-abdominal infections [23, 24]. A European prospective randomized and controlled open-label study showed equivalent efficacy for moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone plus metronidazole (AIDA study) [25]. Moxifloxacin was effective and well-tolerated in both studies, with gastrointestinal disorders like nausea and diarrhea being the most frequent adverse events [26, 27].
Study Design
Aim of the study:
The objective of this trial is to compare the 75-day morbidity of two different approaches to the treatment of acute cholecystitis: (i) laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 hours of hospital admission; and (ii) initial antibiotic treatment with moxifloxacin followed by cholecystectomy in the infection-free interval (Day 7 to 45).
Organization of the study:
The trial is a GCP-compliant, multicenter, prospective, randomized non-blinded study.
Patients with acute cholecystitis meeting the inclusion criteria are randomized to one of the treatment arms. The study is being audited by members of a contract research organization (CRO) and may be subject to government inspection. The trial was approved by the German Number of patients needed:
The primary aim of the study is to compare morbidity in the two groups 75 days after enrolment. A difference in morbidity of less than 10% is defined as equivalent. The null- /ρM1 - ρM2 / > 0.1, where ρMi is the morbidity rate of treatment group i.
Complications are expected in 16% of patients in each group; each group therefore needs to enroll 273 patients to permit verification of the null-hypothesis with an α-error of 0.05 and a β-error at 0.15, yielding a power of 90%. Assuming a validity rate of 85%, 322 patients are required per group, resulting in a total patient sample of 644.
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria:
• Patients with acute cholecystitis with three of the following symptoms or signs abdominal pain in the upper right quadrant rectal temperature > 38 °C or < 36.5 °C cholecystolithiasis (stones/sludge) or sonographic signs of cholecystitis (thickening and triple layer formation of the gall bladder wall) • Immediate antibiotic therapy (400 mg Moxifloxacin i.v. once a day) • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy possible within 24 hours after presentation of the Exclusion criteria:
• Perforation or abscess of the gall bladder • No possibility of laparoscopic surgery • Additional antibiotics needed for secondary disease • Intolerance to moxifloxacin or other quinolones • Pregnancy (also suspected), breast feeding • End-stage liver disease (Child-Pugh C) • Psychiatric or severe neurologic disease • Relevant bradycardia or other symptomatic arrhythmias • Hypocalcaemia or other electrolyte disorders Ethics, Study Registration and Consent
The final protocol was approved by the independent ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00447304). Patients who are scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (immediate or elective) due to acute cholecystitis are informed about the trial (laparoscopic surgery, possibility of conversion to open surgery, other risks, benefits and confidential handling of documented findings) and are given the opportunity to participate at the screening visit. Informed consent is required. Patients may withdraw from the study at any time without giving reasons and without jeopardizing their further treatment. The investigator may also withdraw patients if this is in their best interests.
Randomisation and procedures for minimizing bias
This study is randomized to minimize bias. Sealed randomization envelopes are provided in packs of four by the CRO and are held centrally at each investigational site. An envelope is opened when a patient agrees to take part and patients are informed whether they are to be treated with immediate surgery or initial conservative antibiotic therapy.
Study treatment
Day 1 is defined as the day the patient presents to the hospital. He undergoes a physical examination, vital signs are documented, and an abdominal ultrasound investigation is performed to confirm the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. A blood sample is also taken for standard laboratory diagnosis (including Na, K, INR, Hb, platelets, leukocytes, bilirubin, ALT, AST, gamma-GT, AP, amylase, lipase, urea, creatinin and CRP). All relevant concomitant diseases (e.g. coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus) indicative for morbidity The patient is informed about the trial and is given the opportunity to participate. After the patient has given his informed consent, he is randomized, and all baseline findings, date of birth, age, sex, medical history, height and weight are documented in the CRF.
All patients are examined daily while in the hospital. The laboratory investigations are repeated on Day 3. Samples are taken for microbiological cultures, if necessary. At Day 75 (test-of-cure visit), all diagnostic procedures and treatments between Day 1 and Day 75 are documented. The laboratory determinations and physical examination are repeated, and vital signs are measured. Morbidity is documented according to Table 2.
Procedure for patients receiving immediate surgery:
• Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the 24 hours after hospital admission • Antibiotic therapy with moxifloxacin 400 mg i.v. once per day for 48 hours followed by oral Moxifloxacin 400 mg daily or discontinuation of antibiotic treatment if • Discharge of the patient as soon as possible after Day 2, if the body temperature, CRP Procedure for patients receiving primarily conservative therapy with elective surgery:
• Therapy with i.v. moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 48 hours followed by oral moxifloxacin 400 mg per day. Discontinuation of moxifloxacin after Day 7, provided body temperature, CRP and leukocytes are normal • Discharge of the patient as soon as possible after Day 4 on oral moxifloxacin • Elective cholecystectomy between Days 7 and 45 after admission to study using single-shot moxifloxacin i.v. for prophylaxis Primary and secondary endpoints
Primary endpoints:
Primary endpoint is morbidity at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (75 days after trial inclusion) in the tested population valid for efficacy.
Secondary endpoints:
1. Morbidity over 75 days using the scoring system showed in Table 2 2. Morbidity 3 days after cholecystectomy (immediate and elective) 3. Rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery 4. Change of antibiotic due to non-response or non-toleration of moxifloxacin 9. Duration of hospital stay after cholecystectomy (days) Adverse events and serious adverse events
Adverse events and serious adverse events and deaths occurring up to Day 75 were recorded.
An adverse event (AE) is every medical event that worsens or impairs the well-being of the patient not being part of the natural course of the disease but may be due to treatment or drug application. The term AE can cover any sign, symptom or reaction, including not normal laboratory findings, independent if caused by the tested procedure and medication or not.
Adverse event intensity (mild, moderate or severe) and relationship to the treatment or the study drug moxifloxacin (probable, possible, unlikely or none) were categorized. Serious adverse events (SAEs) included those events that were fatal, life-threatening, required hospitalization, resulted in disability or otherwise endangered the patient.
All AEs and SAEs will be documented in detail in the case report form (CRF) and will be reported to the principal investigator at regular intervals. SAEs have to be reported within 24 hours to the principal investigator, and must be documented separately on an SAE report form within 24 hours. According to law and guidelines, SAEs have to be reported to the ethics committee(s) and supervisory board(s) as necessary. The period of observation for AE Discussion
All statistical tests will be performed two-sided with a level of significance of 5%. The patients will be analyzed as treated. The principle analysis will be on evaluable patients and a supportive intent-to-treat analysis will be performed. Patients will be stratified according to severity of their condition (ASA ≤ 2 vs. ASA > 2); the principle analysis will be stratified, but a non-stratified analysis will also be performed The groups will be tested for equivalence of distribution of age, sex and body mass index. The analysis will be conducted using analysis of variance with the factors study group and severity of disease, stratified by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.
95% confidence intervals (CI) for the difference of morbidity rates will be calculated. If and only if this CI lies between –10% and +10% the two procedures will be considered equivalent. The calculation of the 95% CI will be stratified by severity (ASA ≤ 2 vs. ASA > 2). A Breslow-Day test will be performed to check for homogeneity between these two strata.
Amongst the secondary variables, the mean morbidity score in the two groups stratified by severity of disease will be compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Where appropriate, descriptive statistics will also be performed for all other variables.
Study organization
All eligible patients are seen by a gastroenterologist or surgeon and are enrolled after giving informed consent. The incidence of patients with acute cholecystitis ranges from 10 to >100 per year at different investigational sites. With about 30 sites, it is estimated that enrollment of 644 patients will take about 24 months. All findings are recorded in the patients medical records and CRF provided for this study by the investigator. Data verification is performed by the CRO, who will also perform the analysis on the locked database after plausibility testing Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors contributions
K.W. participated in the design and coordination of the study and drafted the manuscript. J.E., C.G. and J.K. participated in the design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript.
J.E. and C.G. conceived the study. J.E., C.G., J.K. and K.W. supervised the coordination of the different trial centers. M.W.B. and W.S. supervised the coordination of the study. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
References
Lubasch A and Lode H, Antibiotic therapy in cholecystitis, cholangitis and
pancreatitis. Internist, 2000. 41: p. 168-74.
Tokunaga Y, Nakayama N, Ishikawa Y, Nishitai R, Irie A, Kaganoi J, Ohsumi K,
Higo T, Surgical risks of acute cholecystitis in elderly. Hepatogastroenterology,
1997. 44(15): p. 671-6.
Ziessman HA, Acute cholecystitis, biliary obstruction, and biliary leakage. Semin
Nucl Med, 2003. 33(4): p. 279-96.
Browning JD and Horton JD, Gallstone disease and its complications. Semin
Gastrointest Dis, 2003. 14(4): p. 165-77.
Schirmer BD, Winters KL, RF E, Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. J Long Term Eff
Med Implants, 2005. 15(3): p. 329-38.
Bakalakos EA, Melvin WS, Kirkpatrick R, Liver abscess secondary to intrahepatic
perforation of the gallbladder, presenting as a liver mass. Am J Gastroenterol,
1996. 91(8): p. 1644-6.
Hoem D, Viste A, Horn A, Gislason H, Sondenaa K, Cholecystectomy improves
long-term
endoscopic
treatment
stones.
Hepatogastroenterology, 2006. 53(71): p. 655-9.
Strasberg SM and Clavien PA, Overview of therapeutic modalities for the
treatment of gallstone diseases. Am J Surg, 1993. 165(4): p. 420-6.
Johansson M, Management of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results
of a prospective, randomized trial. J Gastro Surg, 2003. 7: p. 642-645.
Lo CM, Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic
cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am Surg, 1998. 227: p. 461-
467.
Giger U, Michel JM, Vonlanthen R, Becker K, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L,
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk
and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2005. 390(5): p. 373-80.
Gurusamy KS and Samraj K, Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy
for acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006. 18(4): p. CD005440.
Papi C, Catarci M, D'Ambrosio l, Gili L, Koch M, Grassi GB, Capurso L, Timing of
cholecystectomy
calculous
cholecystitis:
meta-analysis.
Gastroenterol, 2004. 99(1): p. 156-157.
Lai PB, Randomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy
for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg, 1998. 85: p. 764-767.
Kiviluoto T, Randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for
acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet, 1998. 351: p. 321-325.
Serralta A, Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic
cholecystectomy for early cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2003.
13: p. 71-75.
Chandler CF, Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic
cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am Surg, 2000. 66: p. 896-
900.
Ackermann G, Schaumann R, Pless B, Claros MC, Goldstein EJC, Rodloff AC,
Comparative activity of moxifloxacin in vitro against obligately anaerobic
bacteria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2000. 19: p. 228-232.
Edmiston CE, Krepel CJ, Seabrook GR, Somberg LR, Nakeeb A, Cambria RA,
Towne JB, In vitro activities of moxifloxacin against 900 aerobic and anaerobic
cal isolates from patients with intra-abdominal and diabetic foot infections.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2004. 48(3): p. 1012-1016.
Moxifloxacin
12-8039):
methoxyquinolone
antibacterial. Expert Opin Invest Drugs, 1999. 8(2): p. 181-199.
Schwab D, Grauer M, Hahn EG, Mühldorfer S, Biliary secretion of moxifloxacin in
obstructive cholangitis and the non-obstructed biliary tract. Aliment Pharmacol
Ther, 2005. 22: p. 417-422.
Hartmann D, Jakobs R, Riemann JF, Hepatobiliäre Kinetik von Moxifloxacin nach
intravenöser
Applikation.
Malangoni M, Sequential IV/PO moxifloxacin versus IV piperacillin-tazobactam
+-
amoxicillin-clavulanate
treatment
complicated
intra-abdominal
infections. 44th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy,
ICAAC, Washington, USA, 30 October - 2 November 2004, 2004. L-990.
Malangoni MA, Randomized controlled trial of Moxifloxacin compared with
Piperacillin-Tazobactam and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate for the treatment of
complicated intra-abdominal infections. Ann Surg, 2006. 244: p. 204-211.
Weiß GG, Reimnitz P, Lippert H, AIDA study and AIDA study group, Moxifloxacin
for the treatment of patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.
ICAAC, 2006. L-1299.
Kubin R, Safety update of moxifloxacin: A review of clinical trials and worldwide
postmarketing surveillance. 40th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents
and Chemotherapy, ICAAC, Toronto, Canada, 17-20 September 2000, 2000. 820.
Mandell L, Safety assessment of sequential i.v./p.o. moxifloxacin in the treatment
of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). 11th European Congress
of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, ECCMID, Instanbul Turkey, 1 - 4
April 2001, 2001. P863.
Copeland CP, POSSUM a scaring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg, 1991. 78: p.
356-360.
Table 1: ASA-Criteria
ASA Physical Status (PS) Classification System from the American Society
of Anesthesiologists
ASA PS Category
Preoperative Health Status
Patients with severe systemic disease thatis a constant threat to life Moribund patients who are not expectedto survive without the operation A declared brain-dead patient who organsare being removed for donor purposes American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) Classification System.
Categories to classify the preoperative health status of patients.
Table 2: Morbidity Score
Pain treated by morphine or derivatives > 72 h Rectal temperature > 38.5°C at least twice Persistently elevated CRP or leukocytosis Any problem leading to re-opening of the wound with Need for more than two bags of packed red cells during or after New increase in AP, GGT (>2x ULN), bilirubin (>1x ULN) plus leukocytosis (> 12 x 103 /µl) or increase in CRP (> 5x ULN) New increase in bilirubin, AP and GGT (>2x ULN) Persistent leakage shown by CT, MRI or ERCP Shown by X-ray plus drop in arterial pO2 plus clinical signs of pneumonia plus leukocytosis plus increased CRP Increased PA pressure (echocardiogram), TNT/TNI, D-dimers Increased pancreatic enzymes (> 3x ULN) plus new increase in CRP (> 5x ULN) plus positive clinical signs Drop in urine production below 500 mL/day plus increased New neurological symptoms with corresponding to changes in Changes in TNT/TNI with or without changes in the ECG Leukocytosis (> 12 x 103 /µl) or leukopenia (< 4 x 103 /µl) plus temperature < 36.5°C or > 38.5°C plus clinical signs Different complications and side effects that may affect the patients during the study are listedand scored differently in increasing severity. Death as worst outcome is scored the sum of allcomplications plus 1.

Source: http://gamca.az/uploads/zyYEiXBXut.pdf